If you or a loved one has been injured as the result of medical malpractice, you may be wondering if you have a case. The answer to this question is not always easy to determine and depends on a number of factors specific to each individual situation. In this blog post, we will give you an overview of medical malpractice law in order to help you decide if pursuing a lawsuit is the right course of action for you.
Can I Sue a Hospital for Medical Malpractice?
It is understandable that you would feel angry, frustrated, and even betrayed if you or a loved one has been injured due to medical malpractice. You may be wondering if you have a case against the hospital or doctor responsible for the error. The answer to this question is not always easy to determine and depends on a number of factors specific to each individual situation.
It is not always easy to determine if you have a case for medical malpractice. Several factors must be taken into consideration specific to your individual situation. You might be wondering if it is worth taking legal action. To help you make this decision, we will give an overview of medical malpractice law.
There are four main elements that must be present in order for there to be grounds for a medical malpractice case: duty, breach, causation, and damages.
The Difference Between Medical Negligence and Medical Malpractice
Medical negligence and medical malpractice are not the same thing. Medical negligence simply means that a health care provider made a mistake in your treatment. This could be something as simple as prescribing the wrong medication or making a mistake during surgery. To sue for medical negligence, you must be able to prove that the mistake caused you harm.
Medical malpractice, on the other hand, occurs when a health care provider intentionally harms a patient or acts in a way that shows complete disregard for the well-being of their patients. An example of this would be if a doctor operated on the wrong body part or performed surgery while under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
In order for there to be medical malpractice, there must first be medical negligence. However, not all instances of medical negligence will rise to the level of medical malpractice but the terms are sometimes used interchangeably where context so allows.
What is Medical Malpractice?
Medical malpractice is defined as negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that results in injury or death to a patient. In order for a claim of medical malpractice to be successful, the plaintiff must be able to prove that the healthcare professional acted in a way that deviated from the accepted standard of care, and that this deviation resulted in injury or death.
There are many different types of medical malpractice, but some common examples include:
- Surgical errors
- Anesthesia errors
- Birth injuries
- Misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis
- Medication errors
Elements of Medical Malpractice
Negligence
One of the first things that must be established in a medical malpractice case is negligence on the part of the healthcare provider. This means that it must be shown that the provider failed to uphold the standard of care that is expected in their field. In order to do this, you will need to obtain expert testimony from another healthcare provider who can attest to what the proper standard of care should have been in your specific situation.
The Duty of Care
In order for there to be a successful medical malpractice case, it must also be shown that the healthcare provider owed you a duty of care. This means that they were required to act in a certain way toward you as their patient. Generally speaking, all healthcare providers have a duty of care to their patients. However, there are some exceptions to this rule. For example, if you were treated by a provider who was not employed by the hospital where you received treatment, they may not owe you a duty of care.
Breach of the Duty of Care
The third element that must be present in a medical malpractice case is a breach of the duty of care. This means that the healthcare provider must have failed to meet the standard of care that they owed you as their patient. Once again, expert testimony will be necessary in order to establish what the proper standard of care should have been in your specific situation.
Causation
The fourth element that must be present in a medical malpractice case is causation. This means that it must be shown that the breach of the duty of care was the cause of your injuries. In other words, if you would have been injured even if the healthcare provider had met the proper standard of care, then they cannot be held liable for your injuries.
Harm
The final element that must be present in a medical malpractice case is harm. This means that you must have actually suffered some type of injury as a result of the healthcare provider’s negligence. If you did not suffer any injuries, then you will not be able to successfully sue for medical malpractice.
The Negligence Standard and Medical Malpractice
In order to win a medical malpractice case, you will need to prove that the healthcare provider was negligent. This means that you will need to show that they failed to uphold the standard of care that is expected in their field. The standard of care is generally defined as the level of care that a reasonably prudent healthcare provider would have provided under the same or similar circumstances.
Factors Affecting the Standard of Care in Medical Negligence
There are many different factors that can affect the standard of care, including:
The geographic location where the treatment took place:
The standard of care can vary depending on the geographic location where the treatment took place. For example, the standard of care in a rural area may not be as high as the standard of care in a major metropolitan area.
The type of facility where the treatment took place:
The standard of care can also vary depending on the type of facility where the treatment took place. For example, the standard of care in a hospital will generally be higher than the standard of care in a clinic.
The speciality of the healthcare provider:
The speciality of the healthcare provider can also affect the standard of care. For example, the standard of care for a cardiologist will generally be higher than the standard of care for a family physician.
The type of procedure being performed:
The type of procedure being performed can also affect the standard of care. For example, the standard of care for surgery will generally be higher than the standard of care for a routine office visit.
The patient’s age and general health:
The patient’s age and general health can also affect the standard of care. For example, the standard of care for a healthy adult will generally be higher than the standard of care for an elderly patient with multiple chronic health problems.
The availability of resources:
The availability of resources can also affect the standard of care. For example, the standard of care in a hospital with a well-staffed intensive care unit will generally be higher than the standard of care in a hospital without an intensive care unit.
Expert Witness in a Medical Malpractice Case
In order to prove that the healthcare provider was negligent, you will need to have an expert witness testify as to what the standard of care should have been in your specific situation. This expert witness will generally be another healthcare provider with experience in the same or similar field. The expert witness will review your medical records and give their opinion as to whether or not the healthcare provider met the standard of care.
It is important to note that even if the healthcare provider did not meet the standard of care, they will only be liable for your injuries if it can be shown that their negligence caused your injuries. If your injuries would have occurred even if the healthcare provider had met the proper standard of care, then they cannot be held liable.
Determining if you have a Medical Malpractice Case
If you or a loved one has been injured as the result of medical treatment, you may be wondering if you have a case. The answer to this question is not always easy to determine, and depends on a number of factors specific to each individual situation. In order to decide if pursuing a lawsuit is the right course of action for you, it is important to understand the basics of medical malpractice law.
An experienced medical malpractice attorney can help you investigate your case and determine if you have a valid claim. If you do have a claim, they can help you navigate the complex legal process and fight for the compensation that you deserve.
Who is Liable for Medical Malpractice: Are Hospitals Liable for Employee Actions?
“Respondeat Superior” is a legal doctrine that holds an employer liable for the actions of their employees. This means that if a hospital employee commits medical malpractice, the hospital may be held liable for their actions.
Exceptions to the “Respondeat Superior” Doctrine
There are a few exceptions to the “Respondeat Superior” doctrine.
Independent Contractor:
One exception is when the healthcare provider is an independent contractor, rather than an employee of the hospital. In this case, the hospital will not be held liable for their actions. An independent contractor is someone who contractually agrees to provide a service, and is not an employee of the company they are providing the service for.
An employee of Another Hospital:
Another exception is when the healthcare provider is an employee of another hospital. In this case, the hospital will not be held liable for their actions.
Government Employee:
Yet another exception is when the healthcare provider is a government employee. In this case, the hospital will not be held liable for their actions but the government may be held liable.
Employee Acting Outside of The Scope of Their Employment:
Another exception to “Respondeat Superior” is when the employee is acting outside of the scope of their employment. This means that if a doctor commits medical malpractice while performing a procedure that is not part of their normal job duties, the hospital will not be held liable for their actions.
The final exception to “Respondeat Superior” is when the employee’s actions are specifically prohibited by the employer. This means that if a hospital has a policy prohibiting a certain action, and an employee does that action anyway, the hospital will not be held liable for their actions.
Proving Liability
In order to prove that the hospital is liable for the actions of their employees, you will need to show that:
- The healthcare provider was an employee of the hospital at the time of the incident
- The healthcare provider was acting within the scope of their employment when they committed medical malpractice
- The healthcare provider’s actions were not specifically prohibited by the hospital
- If you can prove all three of these things, then you may be able to hold the hospital liable for your injuries.
When Hospitals May Be Liable for Medical Malpractice for Non-Employee Doctors’ Actions
While “Respondeat Superior” does not typically apply to non-employee doctors, there are a few exceptions.
The Hospital is Negligent in Hiring:
The first exception is when the hospital is negligent in hiring. This means that if the hospital hires a doctor without properly vetting them or checking their credentials, and that doctor goes on to commit medical malpractice, the hospital may be held liable for their actions.
The Hospital Knew or Should Have Known About The Doctor’s Malpractice:
The second exception is when the hospital knew or should have known about the doctor’s history of malpractice. This means that if the hospital was aware of previous incidents involving the doctor, and they did not take action to prevent them from happening again, they may be held liable for their actions.
The Hospital Retained The Doctor After They Committed a Malpractice:
The third exception is when the hospital retained the doctor after they committed malpractice. This means that if the hospital continued to allow the doctor to work at their facility after they were aware of an incident of medical malpractice, they may be held liable for their actions.
Hospital Appeared to be the Doctor’s Employer: The fourth and final exception is when the hospital appears to be the doctor’s employer. This can happen in a few different ways. For example, if the hospital requires that all patients see the doctor at their facility, or if the hospital provides space and equipment for the doctor to use, they may be held liable for the doctor’s actions.
Proving Liability
In order to prove that the hospital is liable for the actions of a non-employee doctor, you will need to show that:
- The hospital was negligent in hiring;
- The hospital knew or should have known about the doctor’s malpractice;
- The hospital retained the doctor after they committed malpractice; or
- That the hospital appeared to be the doctor’s employer.
How to Sue a Hospital for Medical Malpractice
If you believe that you or a loved one has been the victim of medical malpractice, there are a few things you need to do in order to file a successful lawsuit.
- First, you will need to gather all of the relevant medical records and documentation related to your case. This will include everything from doctors’ notes and hospital discharge papers to test results and X-rays.
- Once you have gathered all of this information, you will need to find a qualified medical expert who is willing to review your case and provide an opinion as to whether or not malpractice occurred.
- In order to prove that medical malpractice took place, you will need to show that the healthcare provider in question acted negligently. This means that they failed to provide the standard of care that a reasonable healthcare provider would have under the same circumstances.
- If you are able to prove that medical malpractice occurred, you may be entitled to compensation for your damages. These can include both economic and non-economic damages such as pain and suffering, lost wages, and medical bills.
Remedies for Medical Malpractice or Medical Negligence
If you or a loved one has been harmed as the result of medical malpractice, you may be wondering what your legal options are. The answer to this question depends on the specific facts of your case, and it is important to consult with an experienced medical malpractice attorney to get accurate information about your potential claims.
In general, there are three main types of damages that may be available in a medical malpractice lawsuit: economic damages, non-economic damages, and punitive damages.
Economic damages
Economic damages are intended to compensate you for quantifiable financial losses that have occurred as a result of Medical Negligence. These can include things like lost wages, past and future medical expenses, and any other out-of-pocket costs that have been incurred.
Non-economic damages
Non-economic damages are intended to compensate you for more subjective losses that cannot be easily quantified in monetary terms. These can include things like pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and loss of consortium.
Punitive damages
Punitive damages are sometimes awarded in cases of particularly egregious misconduct on the part of the defendant. Punitive damages are not meant to compensate the victim, but rather to punish the wrongdoer and deter future bad behavior.
The Statute of Limitations for Filing a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit:
The statute of limitations is the deadline by which you must file a lawsuit in order to preserve your legal rights. The statute of limitations for medical malpractice claims can vary from state to state but is typically between two and four years from the date of the injury.
It is important to note that there are some exceptions to the statute of limitations that may apply in certain cases, so it is crucial to consult with an attorney as soon as possible after you believe you or a loved one may have been harmed by medical negligence.
Conclusion
If you or someone you love has been injured due to medical negligence, you may be entitled to compensation. Pursuing a medical malpractice lawsuit can be a complex and daunting task, but with the help of an experienced attorney, you can get the justice and compensation that you deserve.
The first step in pursuing a medical malpractice claim is to consult with an experienced medical malpractice attorney who can help evaluate your case and determine what damages may be available to you. If you believe you have a claim, do not wait to take action, as the statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit is typically between two and four years from the date of injury. Contact us today for a free consultation.
If this blog post was helpful to you, please share it with your friends and family who may be going through a similar experience.